![]() It really doesn’t matter how good the mental images are in your own mind.īecause when you are there, maybe in late, watching at the sun going down, waiting for your models to be prepared for starting the shooting, when you should have been waiting for them to be ready to come back home, asking some friends to help you holding and mounting your lights and tripods and anything else, yes, when you are there, everything becomes really hard hard like nothing in your life could ever be even harder of that time you had to ask the girl you liked to hang out with you.īecause this is what we’re speaking about, a constant heartthrob wandering whether you’ve taken the right decision, made the best choice or not.Īnd when you stare at your model, with the camera at your neck and the lights ready to be shotted, when you are there, even if the only thing you think you’d want to do is to run away going back home, there’s no other place where you really would want to be. It doesn’t matter how much time you stare at your blank page thinking and imaging of how much beautiful your results is going to be It is just giving us some new ways to do things! So, as I wrote in another blog, I think that Technology is not making professionals disappear. And I’m pleased to have had a question that reflect my actual point of view regarding this topic, making me think that I’m not the sole who doesn’t consider Photoshop (and post-production in general) as a monster, or an enemy to defeat to make Reality win. I made the question the most generalised I could, just to have the most generalised answer. When the main battery is drained, the emergency battery can. This virus is simply taking advantage of that. These secondary batteries are essential to androids made to look after humans. People don’t complain about fashion editorials being unrealistic, so why do they complain about covers? Imagine someone made a virus that ate away at any androids battery life, redirecting that energy to an emergency/back-up battery inaccessible to the android. If Vogue started using standard photographs it would lose it’s illusion and just be like every other magazine which uses basic studio shots or candids. So what’s wrong with emphasising images and making them the best they possibly can be via post production? I don’t look at a Vogue cover and think that I need to be like said model or strike to look like her because those looks are unachievable, but that adds to the fantasy of it. People who read Vogue, often read it for a means of escapism. I agree that some publications go too far with it, especially when celebrities end up on cover’s with missing torsos or oddly shaped limbs, but what people seem to forget is that a fashion magazines are based around the idea of fantasy. Photoshop will always be there and whether people like it or not 99 per cent of the time it does make photos look better - whether it be lighting, blemishes and so forth. If you mean photoshopI think it depends on the way you see the industry. ![]() The deeper it goes, the more interesting it gets. errequadro What are your thoughts on post-production in fashion photography today? The iceberg is something used to reflect the idea that things that appear at the top might not look like much but it's just deceiving and the part underneath is more complex and enlarged.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |